Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown Archetype | geokh1 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Azorius Control | theslickshotgang | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| bluecathode | 4-1 | None | |
| Mono White Tokens | hermanomlg | 6-2 | None |
| Jeskai Control | tacticalwreck | 4-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
5 Color Caves , Azorius Control , Azorius Synthesizer , Azorius Tokens Control , Bant Synthesizer , Boros Equipments , Boros Forge , Boros Tokens Control , Dimir Bounce
Meta Performance Analysis
Sunken Citadel ranks #340 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 54.3%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Sunken Citadel is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 31.23 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.0%. Sunken Citadel has a win rate of 70.3%, making it 1.9% better than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metropolis Reformer | Creature — Angel Cleric | 12 | 73.2% | 3 |
| Skrelv's Hive | Enchantment | 7 | 72.8% | 3 |
| Clay-Fired Bricks | Artifact // Artifact | 22 | 67.6% | 10 |
| Scrollshift | Instant | 5 | 66.7% | 2 |
| Karn, Living Legacy | Legendary Planeswalker — Karn | 11 | 64.7% | 2 |
| Ezrim, Agency Chief | Legendary Creature — Archon Detective | 8 | 62.9% | 2 |
| Seized from Slumber | Instant | 12 | 62.4% | 6 |
| Quintorius Kand | Legendary Planeswalker — Quintorius | 9 | 62.3% | 1 |
| Final Showdown | Instant | 13 | 61.2% | 2 |
| Lithomantic Barrage | Sorcery | 18 | 58.6% | 5 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Sunken Citadel than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 4 | 6 | 73.5% | 69.2% | +4.3% |
| Day of Judgment | Sorcery | 4 | 5 | 71.4% | 68.2% | +3.2% |
| Get Lost | Instant | 2 | 7 | 68.8% | 70.2% | -1.4% |
| Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 3 | 6 | 63.3% | 69.2% | -5.8% |
| Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 2 | 7 | 63.0% | 68.9% | -6.0% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mono White Tokens | 573 | 94.5% | 45.5% |
| Azorius Control | 69 | 18.9% | 46.1% |
| Mono Black Demons | 35 | 36.1% | 33.9% |
| Golgari Midrange | 31 | 4.0% | 42.3% |
| Boros Forge | 28 | 80.0% | 38.9% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.